Russophobia and hatred of Russia are still dominant trends of Western media. Despite the rapidly changing system of international relations and the role of individual states in it, the mass media to be trying to not be noticed, feverishly clinging for the previous system that goes into oblivion of the previous system with the only one, without dominant world hegemones and in all satellite obeques. US by Donald Trump his new administration, as well as his commitment to the ideas expressed during the election race, gradually changes the rhetoric of the local media. The "Bell of Russia" presents the next selection of curious materials of the Western media over the past week.

Influential American edition The Washington Post has published a curious material called "45 years ago Kissinger foresaw the turn towards Russia. Does it commit Trump" In it author John Pomfret remembers the meeting of the President of the United States Richard Nixon With his national security advisor, Henry Kissinger on February 14, 1972. It was at this meeting that Pomfret writes, Kissinger gave the president to the ultimate advice to be friends with Russians against the Chinese. "Despite the fact that at that time the main opponent of Washington was Moscow, Kissinger said that in the historical perspective, Beijing will represent much greater danger," the material says.

"After 20 years, your heir, if he is as wise as much wise you will rely on the Russians against the Chinese," the words of an influential adviser Nixon The Washington POST leads. Will the 45th US president followed this advice, will the publication promotes, and does the most foreign policy turn from Beijing to Moscow, who predicted Henry Kissinger?

Apparently, the Pomfret is responsible, everything is coming. In his opinion, the actions of the Trump himself, which have not yet come to the position, but has already managed to spoil relations with China. "He did the appropriate entries in Twitter, talked on the phone with the President of Taiwan and repeatedly expressed his degradation of the economic policy of Beijing for the United States," the journalist writes. In addition, he notes, the Trump is going to appoint a secretary-known relationship with his friendly connections with the President Vladimir Putin Former head of the oil company Exxonmobil Tillerston Rex.

"Before the collapse of the USSR," Washington Post writes, China, which Khrushchev I doried with the USSR on ideological disagreements, addressed the United States to limit the spread of Soviet influence in the world, which manifested itself in the Sino-Vietnamese war, as well as the help of Beijing fought with the Soviet troops of the Mujahedam in Afghanistan. " Now, the publication approves, for the declared new administration of combating China, it is necessary to enlist the support of Moscow. "But what can the United States give Russia to pull it out of Chinese hugs?" - Write the author of the article.

According to Pomfret, relations between Moscow and Beijing are now close as ever. "They support each other in the UN, conduct joint military exercises, building gas pipelines and generally strengthen the level of bilateral economic cooperation," the observer continues. Nevertheless, he notes, the Chinese are contemptuously called Russia "younger sister", while Moscow does not intend to be content with the subordinate role. The growth of China's relics, says the journalist, can be the reason why Russia will still choose the West despite the current high level of relations between Moscow and Beijing. "Trump does not like China, and a man sitting in the Kremlin who wants to restore the former power of Russia. The desires of these people may well coincide on the soil of fears before Beijing, "concludes The Washington POST.

Henry Kissinger and Vladimir Putin

Russia in the conditions of hypothetical improvement of relations with the West should not be rushing to him, turning his back to Beijing. In such a favorable conditions for the confrontation of two giants, Moscow must consistently and skillfully play their contradictions, keeping out of themselves certain concessions and preferences both from one and from the other. Specively playing on their contradictions, Russia will be able to get everything he wants, and even more.

In another, the material The Washington Post writes that Russia is ready to intervene in elections in Germany in the example of the election campaign in the United States. As the observer writes Ann Eplbaum In its material "Germany - the next electional operation of Russia", Moscow has already begun preparations for this. "The first swallow became the recent hacker hacking of the German parliament, which, as German intelligence believes, was produced by the same team as the US Democratic Party Servers," the article says.

According to Epplbaum, the purpose of this operation is to achieve the defeat of the current Chancellor of Germany Angels Merkel On the upcoming elections in 2017. For this, the journalist believes, Russia has already taken the necessary measures. "Enormous funds are invested in propaganda against Merkel, and special media resources have been created," she writes. According to The Washington Post, the Kremlin's main guns in the "Battle of Germany" will be the channels of Russia Today (RT) and the international broadcasting network Sputnik.

"Moreover, the Cremlin's significant funds invested in research centers, a political and business community of Germany. At the same time, some of these people are familiar with Vladimir Putin since its service in the GDR, "says the publication. At the same time, The Washington Post writes that Merkel itself has made many mistakes during his term, including uncontrolled migration from Africa and the Middle East, terrorism, failures in economic politics and so on.

It turns out. That is, the results of the rule of Merkel are disappointing due to a variety of serious errors made by the chancellor. However, if the German people do not want to choose it once again for quite understandable reasons, the Russians will also be to blame. Do you see here somewhere at least a drop of logic? And it is simply no, since what is happening in Western media, very nervously reacting to care from the historical scene, the cozy system of the world order is called simply - "anti-Russian hysteria". And hysteria, as you know, is a consequence of the purely emotional perception of surrounding events, and where they rule the emotions, there is a logic there. Nevertheless, Rosskazni about interference in the Western elections of Russia and Putin personally became a very convenient trend for local politicians, which are very difficult to honestly admit to their own worthlessness and political impotence.

In turn, specializing in foreign policy issues The American edition of Foreign Policy published a material called "How to restore Eastern Ukraine?". In it, the observer Josh Cohen It notes that sooner or later the war will either end and Ukraine will have to begin to restore the destroyed Donbass. According to the journalist, in the most modest counting on it will be needed several billion dollars, although the figure may well increase and up to 15. "Of course, Kiev will ask these amounts by the West, however, to give this money to the Ukrainian authorities, I would consider it too frivolous." , "asserts Cohen.

He recognizes that bribery and corruption reached the largest existence in Ukraine for its existence, therefore it is not a fact that the funds allocated for the recovery will go on direct appointment. Therefore, the browser suggests generally removing the Government of Ukraine from this process. "It is necessary to give all the work on an external contract independent of the Commission," he writes. Cohen notes that for the Ukrainian authorities it will be very bitter and offensive pills, which, however, will have to swallow and yielding their sovereign right to engage in the restoration of the territory under control of international structures.

In principle, this article perfectly characterizes the ratio of the West to Ukraine: bribes and corrupt officials, savages, which can not be given a penny, sorry, nor the cent is not even restoring its own country. Apparently, the West was completely disappointed in Ukraine and perfectly knows the price of its current elite. Hence the conviction that the money allocated by this country should be spent by international structures under clear Western supervision. What kind of independence here can we talk at all?

At the same time, the Western media noted the recent statement of the Russian oppositionist Alexey Navalnywho gathered to nomine as a candidate in the presidential election of 2018. In the material "Populist challenge Putin", the Bloomberg edition declares that the participation of the oppositionist in them is a big intrigue. "He boldly declares about the need to doubt the costs of health care, subsidizing mortgage rates and their decline to three percent, an increase in the minimum salary to 25 thousand rubles," the publication writes. In addition, Bloomberg notes, Navalny wants to introduce a tax on super-profile for oligarchs, enriching the procurement contracts, as well as toughen the punishment for corruption and, in general, to limit Russia's expenses for foreign policy activities.

"In short," Bloomberg writes, "the position of Navalny is very similar to what he spoke at the time of his election campaign Donald Trump, and in the wave of populism both policies are quite similar." In addition, the publication notes, they are similar in their ability to use social networks as an effective agitation tool. "Navalny actively uses Facebook and Twitter in conducting its anti-corruption investigations. Trump also conducted a worthy campaign on social networks and paying them much more attention than his rival Hillary Clinton"Notes Bloomberg. In general, the publication says, although anti-corruption and partly the nationalist populist rhetoric of Navalny is far from news, he, nevertheless, is clearly learn from Trump, who eventually managed to extract victory in elections from his populist-marginal attractiveness.

Comparison, of course, fun. Especially the words about the victory of the tramp, which in this case makes a hint of the possible success of Navalny. That's just a comparison, it is still incorrect. Donald Trump is the biggest businessman, many years manageing his commercial empire. He is a talented negotiator, perfectly understands people and knows how to appoint the necessary posts you need, he appreciates his team and values \u200b\u200bher. For his life, he did a lot and most of this achieved complete success.

And what in his life did Alexey Navalny, what success reached? As a politician it is full zero. Lawyer? Where are the cases won and grateful to him, whom he defended? Wrestler with corruption? But here it is doubtful here. As his former subordinates who worked with him, the oppositionist does not know how to understand people and find the necessary compromises. And this, by the way, is the most important qualities for politics. You can get experience in management, but if you do not know how to pick up the necessary frames, if you are not able to negotiate, then in politics you definitely have nothing to do. However, if Navalny, by approval about his intention to participate in the election, just wanted to once again remind itself in the media, then he definitely reached its goal. Something else other than the information hype, from him, however, and do not expect.

Material prepared Ivan Pescin

During the press conference, Vladimir Putin told about the method of nomination for the next time.

"It will be self-imaging," the president said.

About Saakashvili and "spit" in the face of Ukraine

Vladimir Putin called the activities of the former president of Georgia and the ex-governor of the Odessa region Mikhail Saakashvili "Plevcom in the face and Ukrainian and Georgian peoples."

"How do you suffer so far? - the Russian president is perplexed. "He is the man who was the president of Georgia, and now worn around the squares and shouts for the whole world:" I am Ukrainian. "

On political competition and "immature" opposition

Question to the President asked TV presenter and presidential candidate Kenya Sobchak. Candidate "against all" asked Putin about political competition in Russia.

"Competition, of course, must be, and it will certainly be," the president assured.

Putin also called the opposition policy of Alexey Navalny "Saakashvili in the Russian edition." "Do you want to be tens of such" Saakashvili "on our squares? And you want such "Saakashvili" destabilized the situation in the country? Do you want us to experience from one "Maidan" to another so that we have attempts of state coups? "He responded to the mention of Sobchak about Navalny.

About Trump

American journalist asked Putin, as he appreciates US President Donald Trump. Putin noted that he should not evaluate the Trump, but chosen his Americans.

"With Mr. Trump, we turn to each other by name, so I don't know. If there were "you" or "you" (in English there is no option of pronoun "you" - "Gazeta.Ru"), would we move on "you"? Probably yes",

About the work of the government and plans for a new term

Putin expressed satisfaction with the work of the current government. "In general, the government acts quite confidently and the results of his work are satisfactory," the president noted.

From direct response to the question about their plans for the new term Putin dug. "Well, about it after the election you will need to say ... But I have ideas," said the current head of the Russian Federation.

About army expenses

"Military spending will not affect social programs and will not lead to the destruction of the country's economy, the president said. In 2018, they will compile 2.8 trillion rubles, "the president said.

"Who does not want to feed your army, will feed someone else's",

- Putin joked as follows.

About growing taxes

Putin acknowledged that the tax burden grows. "Not all taxes meet the interests of citizens and the state as a whole. Tax debts, for example, concern 42 million people, their total volume - 41 billion rubles. It is necessary to free people from these payments and make it automatically - without contacting tax inspectors, "the President answered the question of the correspondent of Gazeta.Ru.

About abortion

At the press conference of Putin, opponents of abortions were also present.

"As for the prohibition of abortions. In most countries, these decisions are left behind women. In case of total prohibition, illegal abortions will grow, "the president noted, adding that it is necessary to develop support to families: to introduce payments at the birth of the firstborn, extend the maternal capital program and so on.

About US hopes for help with the DPRK

A foreign correspondent recalled the US desire for Russia to convince Pyongyang to minimize the nuclear program and asked whether cooperation could improve the US and the Russian Federation.

"Your congressmen, senators look so good, they have beautiful costumes, shirts, they kind of smart people. They put us in one row with North Korea and Iran. And at the same time, at the same time pushing the president (USA) so that he persuades us with you to solve the problems of North Korea and Iran. Are you generally normal people? ",

- the president was indignant.

About increasing retirement age

Putin acknowledged that the authorities plan to increase retirement age in the country, but noted that this was a difficult question. The President hinted that, taking into account the course for an innovative economy, may not be enough work at all. Therefore, it is necessary to calculate everything.

"I want to emphasize once again, has not yet been made any decision," Putin stated.

The current retirement plan was adopted in the 30s of the twentieth century, but since then the life expectancy has increased significantly, the head of the Russian Federation recalled. "We have 55 women give birth - thank God and give them a god of health," Putin added.

"Gazeta.Ru" led from this press conference.

On November 8, 2016, the billionaire republican Donald Trump won the presidential elections to overtake his rival Hillary Clinton. On January 20, the inauguration was held, after which Trump began to fulfill his election promises. Some of them, the 45th president of the United States was able to implement alone, and some measures met a sharp conford from the Congress. Republic says that Trump managed to do in the first year of his presidency, and what promises he could not yet.

1. Exit from the Trehochean Partnership (TTP). Three days after the inauguration, Trump signed a memorandum on the US exit from the contract. According to the President of the United States, TTP would deprive the country of jobs. In addition to the United States, Japan, Malaysia, Vietnam, Singapore, Brunei, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Mexico, Chile and Peru are included in the project. The contract actively lobbied the administration of the former US president of Barack Obama. Trump found the document "unprofitable". At the same time, the American leader launched a revision of the conditions for the US participation in the Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

2. Resumption of energy mining.Trump ordered to continue the construction of two oil pipelines at once: Dakota Access Pipeline and Keystone XL. Both projects were frozen when Obama after protests of Indian tribes and ecologists. Trump also decided to revise the "pure energy plan", which adopted the previous administration. The US President removed the restrictions on the production of oil and natural gas in the country and allowed to develop coal deposits.

3. Paris climate agreement. On June 1, 2017, Trump announced that the United States comes out of the Paris Climate Agreement. The total exit of the country from the contract will be completed by 2020. Trump believes that the fight against global warming will lead to the loss of "millions of jobs and billions of dollars". The decision of the American president criticized other participants in the agreement, including Russia.

4. Health reform and cancellation of the Obamacare program. About her desire to cancel the Obama program to support the health care Trump told himself during the election campaign. For 2017, the Senate could not twice to vote for the abolition of Obamacare. October 31, Trump promised to rectify the situation in health care. The US President believes that the program has raised the cost of medical services and increased the influence of the state in medicine as a whole.

5. Wall on the border with Mexico. On January 25, Trump signed a decree on the construction of the wall, which he did not stop talking to the last two years. In the following months, the US Presidential Administration announced a project competition, and the construction of prototypes began in San Diego. That's just Mexico's management still skeptically looks at the idea of \u200b\u200bTrump to exhaust the gigantic wall and refuses to pay for its construction. The US President is confident that the uncontrolled border with Mexico is the reason for illegal migration and crime growth.

6. Tightening entry into the territory of the United States.January 27, Trump limited the entry for Migrants Syria, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Iran, Sudan and Somalia. The US President suspended the program on receiving refugees. Soon the court blocked the action of the document. On March 6, Trump answered a new package of restrictions on the entry, but this time the court challenged the decision of the president and did not give to close the entry for thousands of people.

7. Conflict with DPRK. Over the past 10 months, the DPRK about 25 times spent the tests of ballistic missiles of different ranges. The Trump administration has long called Pyongyang to stop the starts and threatened with new sanctions. As a result, North Korea promised to put a missile blow on the USA on the island of Guam. Trump immediately responded to the words of the North Korean leadership and promised that in the case of the attack of Pyongyang "will face such fire and rage, which the world has not yet seen." In the last couple of months, the conflict has been drunk to military rhetoric, the verbal swords have not yet reached the real hostilities.

8. Relations with Russia.January 28, the Trump first talked with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Then the conversation passed on the phone. The parties outlined the areas for cooperation, spoke in favor of establishing relations spoiled during the Obama Presidency. On July 7, two leaders first met personally in the fields of the G20 summit in Hamburg. The normalization of relations lasted for a long time - July 27, the US Senate approved new sanctions against Russia, after 4 days Moscow answered Washington by expulsion of 755 American diplomats. In response to this, the United States deprived Russia of a part of diplomatic property in the country, and also temporarily stopped issuing non-immigrant visas. The process resumed a week later, but only in Moscow (diplomsses in St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg and Vladivostok ceased their work due to lack of personnel).

9. Impact on the US economy.The first quarter of 2017 was the worst for three years - US GDP showed a minimum growth of 0.7%. At the same time, the Dow Jones index on the very first days of Trump's presidency struck the mark of 20 thousand items and continued to grow during the year. Inflation in September 2017 was 0.53% (a year ago it was not much lower - 0.23%), and unemployment decreased to a minimum for 16 years - 4.2%. However, the indicator has changed not because of the actions of the Trump administration, but due to the consequences of Harvey hurricanes and Irma, who fell into the United States.

10. Trump in numbers. The data for 365 days of the US presidency is not yet calculated, because before the anniversary of the inauguration about two and a half months, but what is known about the first half of Trmpa as head of state: he published 991 post on Twitter (with repeated reference to Fake News phrase), Almost 40 times he went to his own golf courts, met with 50 leaders of the countries and gave 48 interviews (13 times for Fox News).

https://republic.ru/posts/87533.

The Trump administration aggravates relations with Russia through Ukraine

"Trump moved the line and approved the sale of death, this is a significant shift in his administration's approach, as well as in American politics in general .... Apparently, it is impossible to consider the fact that Canada also approved the sale of lethal weapons to Ukraine, as it could only happen if the Canadian government knew about the United States Decision, "wrote Josh Rogin to (20.12). - The State Department this month approved a commercial license, allowing the export to Ukraine of the Sniper MO107A1 system, ammunition corresponding to the spare parts and other accessories in the amount of $ 41.5 million. As for the export of more severe weapons requested by Ukraine, including Javelin anti-tank missile systems (Javelin), there are no permits for their supply. "

"War in Ukraine flashes again after the taper," Endrew Kramer in New York Times (20.12) indicated the same day. - Ukrainian authorities have tied an escalation with the decision of the Russian military to bring officers from the joint center to control and coordinate the cease-fire regime (SCCC), which helped control the shaky arrangement on the cease-fire, known as the Minsk Agreement-2. The Russian Foreign Ministry laid the blame for this to Ukraine, stating that the Ukrainians intimidated Russian officers and that "all responsibility for possible consequences lies completely on the Ukrainian side."

"On Monday, the White House has released a new strategy of national security, which called Russia a" revisionist "power seeking to overturn global order. On Wednesday, President Trump confirmed that it approved the sale of deadly defensive weapons to Ukraine, since it resists the aggression of Vladimir Putin .... The Trump administration approved the sale of weapons in the amount of $ 41.5 million, including the models of sniper systems107A1, ammunition and spare parts, "said Wall Street Journal (21.12).

From the point of view of the editorial board, "Putin probes the ways of expanding the Russian authorities, and then strikes, evaluates the answer to them, and then continues to attack until the price becomes too high. With Barack Obama, he discovered that he could do all this with insignificant consequences for himself. A strong US response to Ukraine will make more impressions on Putin than the entire rhetoric of the Trump on the desire of good relations with Russia. "

Another opinion from Patrick Lawrence from the magazine (21.12): "Putin's statements about the state of affairs in Ukraine, of course, completely contradict Washington's statements on this topic. But they do not contradict reality. Reality contradicts Washington. As Putin noted quite calmly, the number one obstacle on the way of settling in Ukraine for three years is the fully corrupt government, delivered in Kiev after the coup carried out in 2014 without failing. "

"The State Department announced a decision to provide Ukraine with a powerful defensive weapon on December 22, just a few days after the administration's statement that it is ready to allow Ukraine to buy small arms from American producers," said the TV channel (24.12).

"Russian officials stated on Saturday that the US decision to supply Ukraine for combat weapons to combat Russia supported by the separatists will cause new bloodshed, while the old tension between Washington and Moscow aggravated due to the conflict in Ukraine," Washington Post said, (23.12 ). - These complaints from Moscow were expressed after the State Department announced on Friday in the evening that the United States will first provide heavy weapons to Ukraine, which was a step forward from the auxiliary equipment and preparation of personnel offered. "

"The United States moved the line by declaring the intention to supply Ukraine a deadly weapon," Sergey Ryabkov said on Saturday, on Saturday. - American weapons can lead to new victims in the country neighboring with us, and we cannot remain to this indifferent, "the newspaper pointed out.

"Hundreds of supporters of the leader of the Russian opposition Alexei Navalny nominated him for the presidency on Sunday, allowing him to prepare documents necessary for nominations and put pressure on the Kremlin to allow him to run," said New York Times (24.12) with reference to the Associated Press Agency.

"Vladimir Putin, you no longer have to be president," said Navalny during the meeting of the "Initiative Group", which registered his application. - You are a bad president. You have no positive platform. We send you a warning signal in these elections and are ready for victory, "said Indrew Roth, said the" Washington Post "correspondent (24.12).

According to him, "it was a rare political effect in Russia, which contrasted with tides and protests in the last five years, the action with a clear political agenda: to register the most prominent opposition policy of the country to participate in the presidential election, despite the obvious desire of the government to keep Its from this. "

"The head of the Central Election Commission of Russia Ella Pamfilova repeatedly declared that the Navalny was not allowed to run for the presidency because of his previous criminal record," the journalist reminded. - However, the procedure must be observed, and the question of disqualification will be resolved later. On Sunday, employees of the election commission stated that they would wait until Navalny deliver his documents. "

The same correspondent on Monday reported that "the Central Election Commission banned the main leader of the opposition of Russia Alexei Navalna to expose his candidacy for the 2018 elections as an opponent of President Vladimir Putin" (, 25.12). "Navalny said, - according to the testimony of a journalist, - that his supporters must organize the observation of the elections and protest against them because of the fact that this vote is illegal."

"We will not have elections, because Vladimir Putin is terribly afraid, he sees a threat in rivalry with me," Mr. Navalny said in a roller laid out on the network. - He gave an indication of his servants from the Central Election Commission to reject my registration, "said the correspondent" New York Times "(25.12).

"Navalny noted that candidates officially registered to participate in the elections were personally selected by President Vladimir Putin. He promised nationwide street protests. "We will agitate against these fake elections and persuade people do not participate in them," said Mr. Navalny in the video. "

"In the Central Election Commission, Navalny conducted a rapid debate with its chairman Ella Pamfilova. "More than anyone else, we would like you to take part in the elections and demonstrated the result, adequate to your popularity, said Pamfilov. - But since there is a criminal charge, "she said, the commission had no choice. "We are just doing the law," said Pamfilov, expressing Navalny, that he "fools the poor youth" his election campaign. "

The leading media did not even mention about the registration of Ksenia Sobchak.

Insurance materials contain estimates of exclusively foreign media and do not reflect the position of the EOSMI's editorial office.

Of course, in the first approximation, somehow strange and seemingly comic to compare the Russian opposition policy of Alexei Navalny and the current US president Donald Trump. Well, what can they have a common?

In financial terms, they are not compared. True, Alexey Navalny is the leader and head of the Foundation to combat corruption. The Foundation has a premises, equipment for the preparation of televisions, the ability to publish printed products, have headquarters registered in several dozens of Russian cities. At the expense of the Foundation, folk donations come, but still only at the expense of their institution could hardly exist for more than one year, have lawyers, access to the people, so to speak.

The only thing that is somehow comparable between the Trump and Navalny is that the presidential campaign is both actively interfered. But the Trump by the president of his country still stood up, despite the fact that he was going on against him and continues at present, and will not cease, until he is in the first post in the state active and tough, irreconcilable struggle.

With Navalny, too, fight, but formally, within the law. That head of the Central Election Commission, which, entering into this post, promised that everything would be to make the election of all levels in Russia as fair as possible. But in the past year, elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation were held, there were violations there. But somehow everything quietly sued. And suddenly the main lady of elections in Russia stated that Alexey Navalny had no opportunity to nominate his candidacy as a candidate for the presidential post in his fatherland, since it has an outstanding conviction. To which the future presidential candidate itself is responsible that it is not under investigation, and therefore has a formal right to participate in the upcoming elections in 2018. And besides, he believes that he will be able to be peaceful due to popular pressure, so to speak, force the power to do everything possible so that he will participate in the elections of the next year. He even came up with such a slogan - 20! 8, which looks impressive and creatively, but whether the question works.

The fact is that popular support for several years ago helped him. His together with a companion in Kirov was condemned for several years for frauds with the forest (so marked the Fabul of the case a consequence). But in the evening of the announcement of the court decision, several thousand people came out only in one in Moscow to Tverskaya Street (the former - Gorky), that is, to the very center of the city. And the real time was replaced by conditional, but his brother was still condemned for imprisonment, where he was serving a sentence on some not quite understandable.

And after that, Navalny nominated his candidacy for the post of mayor of Moscow, launched a successful campaign according to the results. In the first round of elections, he scored a little more than 30 percent of the votes, and the Mayor of Moscow Sergey Sobyanin is a little more than 50, although there is an opinion that there, during the election, there were some lifestations. Yes, and the administrative apparatus was fully working for Sobyanin, so in that case, we can say that the result of his election campaign was clearly weak.

Donald Trump promised that he would change some laws and programs adopted by the previous administration and put in Hillary Clinton prison. If he gradually copes with the first, despite the fact that all of his initiatives are simply mad confrontation of some part of the establishment and representatives of the legislative power, then with Hillary Clinton, the question remained open. In any case, the punishment of her Trump no longer says anything concrete, which can be judged from what comes in the news to Russia.

Alexey Navalny, in an interview with the most Liberal Russian radio station, said that if he became president of the Russian Federation, the first part of the Prime Minister will plan, dissolves the State Duma of the Russian Federation and return some articles of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in the initial species, as for the six-year-old, as now, by the new edition of the presidential The deadline, and a four-year-old, as was made initially. And makes clarifications that it is possible to be elected no more than two deadlines - not in a row, as it is now stated in the main document of the state, but in general.

Of course, this is, like a lot of things, what is clearly verbally and in writing reports to citizens of Russia Alexey Navalny, great as a program of action. The only problem is that Donald Trump wanted and became president of the United States. And Alexey Navalny, no matter how much about his intention to take the post of leader of the Russian state, most likely, under no circumstances will not be.

Well, all, because the confrontation of his nomination will be even more powerful than it was during the election campaign in the United States in relation to the tramp. And first of all, because the plans of the Russian elite there is no desire that Navalny led the country. No matter how the split is, our elite, according to Belkovsky and other languages \u200b\u200bfrom the language of power to the publicly available, Navalny, does not need any capacity in any capacity.

Whether he needs Russia is also a big question.

It is known that with all the difficulties of life in our fatherland, the people in the mass of their own as - in no way to difficulties. Lighted with them, and the change does not want and afraid of them. Thus, and from this side, Navalny support is not too large.

And everything will be done to damn his initiatives.

He was going to go to the rally on June 12, on the Independence Day of Russia, so only he came out of the entrance, he was arrested for 30 days for an administrative offense. Then 5 days the punishment was reduced. Schoolchildren and students went to him, want to adopt a law prohibiting schoolchildren to participate in political actions, and students worked out as in Soviet times so that they would not participate in such unpleasant power events.

For each of his move, symmetrical response measures are invented on all initiatives, so the probability that with a positive coincidence, he will gain a solid number of votes in the first round of the presidential election of 2018 in Russia, nevertheless. Yes, and, as you know, you can always count the voices, as you need, and in the case of participation in the Navalny elections - especially, since he is not a beautiful young lady, will punish submersers in the full program. And who may like it?

So keep in mind Navalny as a challenger to power in Russia - it is possible, but still - it is useless and meaningless, although, frankly, I would very much like to make a mistake in this conclusion.