The participant of the EE has the right to file an appeal:

On the violation of the established procedure for holding the exam - on the day of the exam after passing the forms of the USE before exiting PPT
On disagreement with the results of the USE - within 2 business days after the official announcement of the results of the exam and familiarize themselves with the participant of the EGE

Appeals are not accepted:

Appeal of a violation of the established procedure for holding an exam

The actions of the EGE participant:
At the end of the exam, without leaving the PFE from the organizer in the audience form (two copies), on which the appeal is made
Transfer both copies by an authorized GEK representative, which is obliged to accept and certify them with his signature, one copy to give the participant to the EGE, another to convey to the conflict Commission
To obtain a result of the consideration of the appeal in its educational institution or in local governments, carrying out permissions in the field of education (MOU) no later than 3 calendar days after its submission of possible solutions to the conflict commission:
If the appeal is satisfied, the result of the USE is canceled and the participant is given the opportunity to pass the exam on this subject in another (reserve) day. He is appointed the date and place of re-passing the exam on the relevant subject.

Notes:
The decision to cancel the results of the EEG may be taken:
If the service investigation of the GEK confirmed the fact of violation of the established procedure for conducting the EGE
If the conflict commission was satisfied with the appeal of a violation of the established procedure for conducting the EGE
If the authorized representative of the GEK, the public observer or authorized representatives of Rosobrnadzor, as well as the prosecution authorities and law enforcement agencies established the facts of violations of the Procedure for holding the EGE at the EGE clause, which could have a significant impact on the results of the EGE

Appeal of disagreement with the results of the exam

The actions of the EGE participant:
Within 2 workers, after it was officially familiarized with the results to receive a responsible secretary of the conflict commission (for graduates of the current year - at the head of his educational institution) form in 2 copies, on which appeal is made (it is possible to appeal in arbitrary form)
Create an appeal in 2 copies
Transfer both copies to the above faces (which are obliged to accept and certify them with their signature, one copy to give the participant to the EGE, another to convey to the conflict commission)
Get information about the time and place of appeal
If possible, come to the procedure for consideration of appeals to a conflict commission, having a passport and a passport with a passport - the forms of the EE applied- (or the PPE stamp)
Confirm in the appeal protocol that he was presented with copies of his forms and the correct recognition of his answers in the blanks
participate in the appeal
sign an appeal review protocol

Possible solutions to the conflict commission:
Departure of the appeal due to the lack of technical errors in the processing of the forms of the exam and errors in evaluating experts by answers to the tasks in free form and the preservation of the exposed points;
Satisfaction of appeal and setting other points.

Appeal is submitted of disagreement with the exam results in general. As part in the application is not specified. The participant of the EGE, which has been an appeal, is given the opportunity to make sure that its examination work is verified and appreciated in accordance with the established requirements.

Notes:
When considering the appeal instead of the participant of the USE or, together with him, his parents (legal representatives), which should also have passports with them (legal representative should also have other documents confirming its powers).
In case the participant of the USE or his parent (legal representative) has not appeared to appeal, the correctness of the recognition of the answers is confirmed by the members of the Conflict Commission.
Drafts as appeal materials are not considered.

The scanned image of the examination work can be submitted to the participant of the EGE (legal representative) only during the appeal procedure. He is given the opportunity to make sure that his examination work is verified and appreciated in accordance with the established requirements. In the hands of work is not issued.

To pass the exam - it is half an end. But the expectation of the exam results often seems long and painful. After all, each graduate is afraid to get points for a single state exam less than expected. However, it is possible to get a low estimate not only because of the incorrect response. So in what cases can doubt the low score and submit to appeal? Let's deal with together. What is the reason for the appeal of the results of a single state exam?To date, there are several reasons for appeal.

First, the reason can be disturbed in the exam - the procedures for holding the exam. For example, if during the exam in the office or in the corridor was noisy, or on all the letters did not have enough blanks of work or drafts, which are obliged to provide inspecting before the beginning of the final work. In these cases, the appeal must be submitted on the same day without leaving the school walls in which the USE is held.

Secondly, the most important and common occurrence for the appeal can be disagreement with the scores exhibited for the final work. This does not mean that you can come with an unreasonable claim. If a graduate comes and complains about unsuccessful questions, no one will listen to him. Here we are talking about such cases when the computer incorrectly recognized the answer in the test part. Or when the expert, when checking the work, allowed the oversight and himself was wrong. In this case, it is necessary to give an appeal to submit within two business days after the publication of official data on the USE. It should be understood here that you should not wait until the school will find lists with exam results. There may not be done immediately. Official data is published on the website of the Unified State Exam. It is necessary to check the results as often as possible.

In other cases, the appeal will not even be considered.

When to challenge the results of the EG meaninglessly:

· If there is a claim for the assignment itself (for example, when a graduate did not understand the essence of the question);

· If the schoolboy himself violated the rules for passing the exam (for example, came to the exam with the phone, he wrote off or spoke during the exam);

· If the final work was not framed by the rules.

· If a graduate disagrees with the results of the test part. Appeal is possible only if the computer has recognized something incorrectly.

How is the appellate statement?

The application itself is drawn up in several copies: one schoolboy leaves himself, the other must be given to the chapter of the commission for a signature (often this is the director of the school in which the USE is handed over). Then one copy is sent to a conflict commission. It is there that the appeal is deciding and the further fate of the examination work of the student.

If the graduate has filed an appeal due to the violation of the exam, there are records from video surveillance cameras that were in the audience at the time of the exam. Observers and helpers are also interviewed. If the violations were really, the Commission fixes them and annuls the results of graduation work. Then the schoolboy needs to recall the exam in reserve days. The conflict commission also has a certain period. So, to make a decision on the work on which the complaint was received, they are obliged within two working days from the date of receipt of the application.

In case the graduate has a claim on the points of employment, the Commission for consideration has four working days. If the student does not agree with the results for the test part, which the computer checks, then the specialists independently check the work. After that, the results are updated, in fact, the presence of the graduate itself is not required here. If the appeal is given to the oral or written part, then the student issues the entire package of documents: a copy of the work (the original in the hands is not issued), audio recordings of answers, as well as protocols with estimates and all marks and notes. Although when the student gives out his exam work, he should also pass the draft, in the case of appeal, it is not considered. Therefore, if the graduate recorded all the answers on Chernivik and did not have time to transfer them to a special form, to file the complaint and try to challenge the results is useless.

What arguments need to be used on appeals?

The Commission appoints the time and place of appeal. Prepare for this point needed in advance and carefully. Since the student can come together with parents or guardians, but the teachers simply will not be allowed. Therefore, you need to discuss all the details and arguments with it separately. Yes, and come up with a move will not work - on a conversation with the student, a maximum of 20 minutes is given. It is important to immediately emphasize that the graduation work meets all the requirements. To do this, you also need to find out all the criteria for the work, which are described in detail on the website of the Federal Institute of Pedagogical Measurements.

After conversation, the Commission decides. The results of the work can really change if there was a technical error (computer), or incorrect evaluation of work by experts. However, it is worth remembering that the scores for work experts can raise and take away. Therefore, you need to think if it is worth risking. Experts note that the so-called medalists and olelphiases are most often served on appeal - those graduates who need to score at least 75 points to confirm their knowledge and get benefits upon admission to the university.

How many points on the exam can be added by appeal?

On average, by appeal, you can add from one to three points for the exam. Make it turns out mainly in the test part. But the written or the oral part of the work is checked by matret experts, which extremely rarely allowed, "knock out" points and prove their right thing much more difficult. Although since the existence of the exam in Russia, there were such cases when students defended their position and raised the results of the exam on 10 points.

Recall the graduates are already might and. In the Saratov region, a single state exam began on May 27. And the first mandatory subject, Russian, schoolchildren.

This year there was no scandals associated with the leakage of kima before the exam, relatively few cases of writing, but significantly increased the number of complaints about the procedure and the essence of appeal of disagreement with the scores of the exams. Pedsovet collected several of the most indicative stories about how appeals happened.

Why is the appeal of the exam in the Russian language - is it a scam?

1. The deadline for filing appeal is limited to two days. If you work, you will not have time to prepare for it.
2. You do not show the kim (tasks), including the text on which the writing is written.
3. The test is not allowed and the correctness of the designation of tasks (meanwhile there are errors and incorrectly drawn tasks).
4. You do not allow you to familiarize yourself with the full package of the exam. Sick the child on the signature of individual pieces and do not give time to familiarize themselves with them.
Documents will not be charged. Aunties are worn with boiled paper. You can lose or postfactum to replace any of them.
5. There is no essay of experts in the composition, so they are difficult to challenge. The crazy experts of the conflict commission are sometimes not able to even carefully read the text, so they prefer to intimidate the child and parents, or the brand lie and carry in the Ocolesitz, pointing to the "errors" where they are not.
6. You do not allow you to enjoy written explanations or a motivated appeal. That they are afraid of fire ..
7. Limit the time 15-20 minutes.
8. You will not recognize the FIO of Experts. They are anonymous.
10. Specially cuddled and confusion, hundreds of people are being skipped in one day through QC. There is no needed room. Several CC sit in one class.
11. You are constantly screaming, threatening to remove the scores already exposed.
12. On the phone of the hotline of Rosobrnadzor, it is impossible to get through.

The appellate cannot affect anything

We have passed the History with your husband this year as graduates of past years.

My husband was put very low, completely unreasonable. He went to the appeal, was preparing for the protection of his position a whole evening. But it turned out that the appellate cannot affect anything: the Commission replaced the work in advance and brought results to the protocol. The appellate comes simply to personally find out its result from the commission. As a result, he pounced 3 points - they were completely incompetently removed during the first check. But the fourth challenging point did not put him and could not explain why. Allegedly in the composition was an actual error. How many husband asked him to specify this mistake to him, to make this commission could not. They pulled out some kind of wording for their ears, only to answer something. I suspect a violation of the rules, after the appeal, the husband called the Federal Hot line of Rosobrnadzor, and there confirmed that the appellate could not affect the recheck, its evidence is not needed. So the presence of a parent, teacher or tutor is only needed for psychological support. Yes, and the presence of the student itself is not clear why.

We did not return points, although the evidence was reinforced concrete

Our conversation looked something like this:
- The topic in the task 15 is well disclosed, but the score will not return, because it was possible to start with the poet's biographical data.
- No, it was impossible. To replace the lyrical hero by a biographical author - one of the gross mistakes in the exam in literature.
- Hmm ... But then look, she wrote that the poet should remain real. It was necessary to say "true", this is an actual error.
- There is no mistake, these are synonymous words.
- Eee ... See what handwriting is bad. Surely you can find any speech errors.
- There are no speech errors.
- If you wish, anyway can be found.

When you come, then everything has already been solved

This year I handed over the exam in your subjects, of interest. I went to the appeal, as a fool was preparing his strategy for the whole evening, and I was just as simply introduced to the results of the revision of my work. On the hotline of Rosobrnadzor, they said that such an order and everything went without disturbances. So, alas, yes - to prepare for appeals meaningless. When you come, then everything is already solved, the protocols are signed.

Wrong because not right

Today visited the appeals on the exam in social studies. There, administrative right does not work, there, as we were told, "educational law". Them would be on advanced training ... So, News:
1. Informational and post-industrial society is the same thing.
2. In the USA - not democracy.
3. The world has two post-industrial countries - Japan and the United States.
4. Economic growth can not be determined as the stage of the economic cycle.

The procedure is opaque, the conflict of interest is not eliminated, the Regulation establishes only the general procedure, all "particular" - at the discretion of the Chair. Arguments on issues are prohibited. The result of the appellate is already known (!) At the time of entry into the office and really read it. Imagine, really ... you come, you just talk the result ... and everything ... and do not care that none of them understand what GDP is! And yes, by the way, note, GDP is the volume of production. Urgently change the SNS and textbooks. And call Rosstat, otherwise they do not know.

In the morning there was Professor Polyakova, and he became "Listen to Mom" \u200b\u200bto dinner. This is a complete profanation. And after that, the question: who teaches our children and what. After all, it is risky to assume that the Commission is sitting not the worst teachers. Of the need to comply with the law on personal data, I do not post the names of heroes.

How in Krasnodar violated the holding of an appeal

This year I graduated from grade 11 and passed the exam. I was not pleased with the result of literature - only 69 points. What to do in this case? You can either come together and enter the university for commerce, or file an appeal of disagreement with the results that I have done. I will say right away, everyone fought us with the fact that they will remove points for the work, which is better not to serve anywhere. Poons did not remove me, but did not add. But the procedure itself was in Swine.

1. I came to the teacher of my school and filled out the appeal form. It was important to choose, I will be present when considering my work / work will consider without me / instead, my legal representative will be present. I chose the first, i.e. My job had to double-check with me. After that, I delivered a form on the signature to the director and began to wait for the date when I need to take the form into the center of education.

a) On the Internet it is written that the form was supposed to be in two copies. I was given one and there was no problem with this.

2. I came to identification. I looked through the sheets, signed the paper for the right scanned first part and the integrity of my work. There was just the first bell. I asked the woman, how much I need to come to appeal. At first she was jammed: "The results will be reported by phone." But when I insisted, it turned out, at 14:00 the meeting will be held in the assembly hall, where they are also invited. On this we said goodbye.

3. I came to the meeting. The hall was full of graduates with their parents. Experts were sitting on the sides, and on stage - 10 people were sitting at a huge table, "big y" (managers).

So, it started most interestingly. I thought that I was defending my right thing, I would drive my points and I would do my faculty without any problems. But no. The main woman (alas, I do not remember how it was called) Told all of us sitting in the hall: "Your work has already been tested. Now we will announce your results. If you have any questions - you can ask them to experts, but your points will no longer change" .

I will not tell you how sweetly we talked with a woman expert about romanticism in the poem of V. Soloukhina or how 3 girls were happy, which from 20-30 present raised points. I will tell why I write about it here and ask for your help. Now there is such a thing as "Internet" (yes), so I talked to people who were on appeals in other cities. They called the circus what happened in our city. First, I was not given to sign a document about my consent with the result of appeal. Those. She seemed to be it. Secondly, as you remember, I decided to personally attend the appeals, it means that my job was to check with me, in a separate audience (possibly without me, but the private meeting was to be) and only after that post points (as it was done in other cities).

I was simply set me out before the fact that violates the procedure for the appeal. If someone know where and how to write a complaint in this case - please unsubscribe in the comment, my future and the future of other graduates depends on this. With the help of Internet resources recently exposed the limestoneist, do not silence and it. I can do something wrong, but here I told about everything I know, about everything, about what I was informed.

The pedsovet could not find the appellant, which this year was as a result of the appeal to increase his score more than 3 primary. Although we found those who believe that it is eligible for a more serious increase, and is ready to prove it. We hope that the case is not in the installation, down to all the appellate commissions, but in the fact that we were poorly looking for.

The current legislation in order to ensure the right to objective assessment of knowledge to the participants of the USE is provided with the right to submit an appeal against a violation of the established procedure for conducting a general educational subject and (or) on disagreement with exposed points to the conflict commission. The Conflict Commission does not consider the appeals on the content and structure of control and measuring materials on general education subjects, as well as on issues related to the violation of the EE participant of the established requirements for the implementation of examination work. The participants of the exam and (or) their parents have the right to be present when considering the appeal. In violation of the procedure for holding the exam, students file an appeal on the day of the exam on the relevant general education subject to the authorized representative of the State Examination Commission, without leaving the item of the EGE. In order to verify the information set out in the appeal of the violation of the established procedure for the EE ent, the Commission is created by the Commissioner and the Conduction is created. The proposed commission may include the head of the exam, organizers, public observers, health workers and representatives of law enforcement agencies. The inspection results are issued in the form of concluding commission. The appeal and the conclusion of the Commission on the results of the inspection on the same day are transferred to the Commissioner of the GSE to the Conflict Commission. When considering an appeal of a violation of the established procedure for conducting the EGE, a conflict commission considers the appeal and concluding a commission on the results of the inspection and makes one of the decisions: on the departure of the appeal; On the satisfaction of appeal. If the appeal is satisfied, the result of the USE is canceled and the participant of the USE is given the opportunity to pass the exam on this general education subject to another day, as provided for by the Unified Schedule of the EEG in the current year.

Appeal of disagreement with exposed pointscan be filed with a student within two working days from the date of announcement of the results of the EGE According to the relevant general educational subject. About the time and place of consideration of appeals. Students who have applied to appeal should be informed in advance. The head of the point of the exam or an educational institution, who accepted the appeal, should immediately convey it to the conflict commission. When considering an appeal of disagreement with exposed by points, a conflict commission requests the printed images of examination work in the Regional Information Processing Center, which are submitted to the exam. A graduate must confirm that the images of the exams performed by them are presented. According to the results of consideration of the appeal of disagreement with exposed points, the conflict Commission decides on the departure of the appeal and the preservation of the exposed points or on the satisfaction of the appeal and exhibit other points. In case of identifying errors in the processing or verification of the examination work of the EEG member, the conflict Commission transmits relevant information in the RCC to transfer to an authorized organization in order to recalculate the results of the EGE. According to all issues in order to appeal the results of the EGE, you can contact the department of education of the administration of the municipal district, city. In the event that you think that your right to appeal against a violation of the established procedure for conducting an EGE or disagreement with exposed scams is violated, you can contact the prosecutor's office or to court within the framework of administrative proceedings.

The field, a duel - all this historically sanctioned by the state ways to determine justice when it is impossible to do this in a different way. Whelfate, appeal! How many such fights have passed throughout the country in the struggle for the EGE-2015 scores on social studies! About some of them are our story.

Get help of an expert exam in preparation for appeal of disagreement with the scores!

Appeal for the results of the exam

So, EGE-2015 in full swing. The main days of examinations were completed, reserve began. Over the country, consider the scores of the exam. The state authorities - the average (they, according to pre-attacks, for example, in Russian, profile mathematics and social studies, increased by an average of 3 points). The graduates received all the results are common to admission (universities already accept documents). And some are preparing for their revision. That is to appeal.

What is an appeal? This is a verbal duel of a graduate and experts who checked work. Humanitarian items are especially history, social studies often contain in the form of answers are not dogma, but assumptions, theory. And the appeal is often turning into a conversation ... what did you mean? (as he sang in a popular song).

As we can see, the EGE participant can not only increase, but also has the chances of losing points as a result of consideration of his work in the writing part 2. Since last year, by the way, it is possible. About that another time. The appeal procedure itself, by the way, causes absolutely its different assessments ... It seems that sometimes it depends on the personal discretion (or arbitrariness) in the field. For example, look at interesting comments on our record about and the graduates themselves therefore simply guess that they are waiting for closed doors on appeals. Here is an example of one of the "explanatory works" in social networks:

As we see, preparation for appeal begins long before receiving the results of the exam. It is necessary to prepare seriously. After all, the EEG statistics indicate that only less than 10% of the appeal submitted can count on its at least partial satisfaction.

And what does statistics say?

Let's look at the statistics of subscribers of our group
. So, how did our subscribers passed the EGE-2015 on social studies?

Average above the guys in the country (While the average score, declared Rosobrnadzor without taking into account the reserve and appeal (on which, however, globally changes little) it is 56.65. And about 60% of our subscribers who were preparing for the materials of the site and the group, were passed in between 60 to 80 points, more than 20% are high-voltages (more than 80 points!).

What does our statistics on appeal on the social science of 2015 say?

The result of appeal to the exam-2015 social science. Survey http://vk.com/egewin.

Of those who voted under 90% on appeal simply did not go. For different reasons. but about 10% managed to defend from 1 to 3 of their Which can then give a decent increase in the test score on a 100-point scale.

Unclean approach to appeal to the result of the exam

Do I need to fight for your points? We believe that yes! Although, there is an opinion that it is often useless. However, to convince experts with truly low points (and this is the result of natural subjectivism, human factor, the fatigue of the expert and the whole complex of causes). For example, here is my graduate dialogue Alisa Marisova, I managed to defend the whole 3 primary points!

But an example of a different attitude towards the appeal procedure.

Many graduates understand that the appeal competently prepared by consultation expert exam, It can allow them important to enter a score-other. But ... this is the time of the expert, and may be his paid service. Another dialogue in the studio (with Evgenia Zemlyanskaya). Please check the essay:

A small remark for infantile graduates. Analysis of your essay is the responsibility of the teacher who had social studies. I do not owe you anything, agree? And now you will multiply the number of similar to your appeals to me on part of passing the exam in society in Russia?

Learn to respect someone else's work and know that in adulthood, where you go out for everything you need to pay.

Constructive approach to appeal to the result of the exam

But another appeal to the expert, and a completely different attitude to the need for an appeal, understanding its extreme importance for the final result, income. Note that Ale Karpayev - First course student, learns in Vladivostok. Last year, the budget could not pass, and again tries to get the score required for budget this year! Ege-2015 on social science she passed on 82 points(25 above average in Russia!).

Note that in the test part 1 graduate lost only 1 point! A little worse there were cases in for which Ale and was going to fight with my help! At the same time, it's nice when thanks for the work thanks for the work (Elya during the preparation applied the author):

Analysis of responses and selection of an appeal strategy

Let's look at the blanks of the 2 graduates that she received in his personal account on the technical support resource EGE-2015:

We note a large amount of work done by an applicant, good reading handwriting and absolutely faithful design of answers: where it is necessary, the condition of the task is discharged, the work of the expert is facilitated. Such works usually cause only the desire to meet a graduate!

So, we didn't have the text and tasks to it in our hands, so the task is 30, the wording of which the applicant did not remember, we decided to leave. Our attention was focused on tasks

Rough mistake. on this You will not care for anything, here the appeal is meaningless.

Task 34.

For this task was not set up one of the points, the maximum - 3.

Task 34.

34 Honestly, I do not understand what I came out. All true you have led all three signs of this type of society. Can only vaguely sound "Rising life expectancy." Formally, it happens in compared to but, you clarify * Developed medicine (ideally, of course, it would be nice to finish that medicine is able to defeat the incurable diseases - cancer, AIDS).
Here need to fight. Now we give an example for the argument about the development of medicine in the industrial society.

In the USSR by 1960 by 10 thousand people accounted for 20 doctors, in the RSFSR - 19.3, in Western Siberia only 15.5. Scientific library of dissertation and abstracts Dissercat http://www.dissercat.com/content/razvitie-zdravookhra .. (Health development in the cities of Western Siberia (1946-1960.) Thesis for the degree of candidate of historical sciences. Dudkin MP).

2010. Among the countries with the largest number of doctors per capita, Russia, according to WHO, occupies the fifth place - for every 10 thousand Russians there are 42 Medics with higher education.

That is, comparing Industrial Indicators (1960) and Societies (2010).

Mobility of industrial society mass. For example, a massive move to cities, migration to the new light (USA XIX century).

No, I'm not about it. It is clear that mobility channels and more and access to them is also wider. The industrial public person is attached to the machine. Mobility of post-industrial society is individual. Transport means are much more developed. The Internet is added. It allows a person creating an information product, engaged in traveling by changing the countries of the world. An example from life is the phenomenon of freelance. So do their job and earn the creators of information, information product - web designers, people of free professions. We are much more mobile than a person 20-30 years ago.

The final arguments of the members of the conflict commission turned out to be more than paradoxical:

1. Russia is not a post-industrial society (!!!).2. The theory is not related to practice (!!!).

Well, on the face is complete incompetence and inability to move away from the mental template, nesting, simply speaking. Attempting here to sort out the score failed.

This is a complex plan. And again we fight for 1 not exposed score.

I am confused primarily the structure of your plan. It looks like a convulsive attempt to throw everything on paper, you know about a structure and its deservedness is one of the key evaluation criteria.
Ideally, he could look like this:

1. The concept of "power"
2. Types of power:
- Political
- Economic
- Military
- spiritual
- information
3. Signs of political power:
- Sovereignty
- Legitimacy
- concentration in the hands of the state
- Monopoly on legal use of force
- Monopoly on the publication of laws
4. We would coincide

So, they could reduce for: 1. Lack of information on other types of government; 2. The absence of a response structure (for example, the concept is exactly not necessary to disclose); 3. Point "Principles of Existence". For example, subparagraph b) performance. Are political reforms, for example, always effective? 4. An important point about the state and its role "hid" at the end and did not disclose. And they should have nominated to the fore.

This structural approach is called. If political is a variety of power to start with power. On the plan you can try to appeal, but I think I will not be the result.

And, indeed, according to the applicant, experts in the conflict commission were going to even reduce the score (they have the right !!!).